How is Sola Scriptura incoherent?

A Trinity was first mentioned as G-d, His Word and His Wisdom, by Theophilus of Antioch.

So, how does that affect the Athanasian Christian doctrine of the Trinity?

The New Testament identifies Jesus. Literally, spelling it out in Acts 3.

Why are liberals so bad at grasping alternative facts? For example, if something doesn’t happen the exact same way Trump described it, liberals dismiss it as false; while conservatives are able to fully understand the underlying principle.

John 20:17] Jesus said to her, “Do not cling to Me, for I have not yet ascended to My Father; but go to My brethren and say to them, ‘I am ascending to My Father and your Father, and to My God and your God.’ ”

But it was not until the efforts to create a uniform Christianity at Nicaea that the concept became the accepted tradition, to create a universal (catholic) interpretation of the writings.

But if you read it through the filter of the traditions of a Trinity, you will miss it (like many miss Jesus telling Mary about Mary’s G-d being Jesus’s G-d). That is incoherent.

Is a man who enjoys anal sex considered a sissy? For those who think so, why can't they be thought of as someone who enjoys a variety of sexual pleasure?

Nuda scriptura is scripture alone. Sola scriptura looks at the writings and the traditions, with the writings (source of the traditions) having greater relevance.

Later, Tertullian would lay the foundations of the Trinity.

Considering that the traditions stem from interpretations based off the writings, sola scriptura would be the means to test the coherency of the traditions.

Do Republicans realize that the power of the people is invested in 'representative government'? If so, why did they elect a pathological liar?

For example, Jesus has a God …

How is Sola Scriptura incoherent?

Read also: